In my study of and training in Christology, I have come to learn and to observe nearly every varied interpretation and manipulation, if you will, throughout history has been attempted, offered, and promulgated by heretics as to whom Jesus was and is. There is a truth and a saying when one studies Church history: “there are no new heresies”. This is so true. That word, heresy, grates on the modern ear. We much prefer the calm, soothing, comforting, anesthetizing sounds of relativism – contemplation without thought, without challenge. Peace at any cost, peace in our time. Thank you, St Neville Chamberlain (Warning: NOT a real saint!) This is so as opposed to a more challenging, sobering truth.
The rational mind with integrity cannot accept mutually exclusive truths and rest easy. The Church may have to deal with heresies for a time, from time to time, hopefully refute and suppress them successfully, but given the mind of man, general ignorance of and training in the theological sciences, our own willfulness and refusal to learn from our forbears in faith who have climbed Himalayan mountains of faith, thought, and life’s experiences, add in the work of the Enemy, and heresies constantly return over time mutated, altered, changed, but still holding onto the core deception. Bad thinking leads to bad action. History is replete with examples.
The most difficult conclusion human beings have had to come to, the hardest to hold, and the most embattled throughout human history, is that He was Whom He said He was: the Son of the Father, co-equal with the Creator and the Holy Spirit in true Trinitarian theology. I feel this is the most challenging since it begs of us the most difficult questions and challenges us profoundly. How would we live differently if His divinity were not an article of faith? But, rather, a daily, moment-by-moment live experience of fact – as we define fact? How would we live differently if we knew our appointment with Him were not merely a possibility, but an inevitability? For this reason, I believe this conclusion is the most difficult to which to come and hold because of the profound challenges and questions it poses – too much to bear many would claim. Hence, the heresies, both ancient and modern, and the human temptation towards them continue.
Arius (250-336 AD) was a bishop from Alexandria, Egypt. He taught that Jesus did not always exist, but was created by the Father and was of a different substance than the Father, nearly, or actually, implying Jesus was perhaps divine, but not Divine as God is Divine, but also a creature of God, like us, only better. At the heart of the Arian heresy, if taken to its logical conclusion, was truly to call into question Jesus’ divinity. At best, a second rate divinity, really.
It is really helpful at this point if one knows a little Greek and understands how one letter, “i”, one iota, literally, can change the entire meaning of a word and generally cause a big fight. But, I will spare you that for now. (Jehovah’s Witnesses and Seventh Day Adventists have sometimes been referred to as Arians or Semi-Arians. Unitarian Universalists deny the Trinity altogether, as well as several other problems. Gnosticism, which pre-dates Christianity, has been recreated in the modern age as Freemasonry and Scientology.)
Ok, I lied,
homoiousios/ηομο and homoousios/ηομοουσιος The first, the heretical word if inserted into the Creed, means of a “similar essence/substance”. The second means of the “same essence/substance”. BIG FIGHT!!!!! It caused such a huff, the Emperor Constantine ordered a Church council to meet, the Council of Nicea (325 AD), and work it out for the sake of peace in the empire. Wars have been fought over the words in the Creed, which is why I am always so scandalized when new, creative, modern, “Oh, what the hell. Let’s use this one today” type creeds get used rather blithely in Christian, especially Catholic worship. No wonder people, even the ordained, mea culpa, are often confused. When I teach young people, consistently they present their brains to me as so much theological mush. I fancy myself a theological personal trainer for the young – tightening their theological core, as my actual personal physical trainer is teaching me to tighten mine. Ouch! I am a certified catechist, you know. St Athanasius, pray for us!
When we recite the Nicene Creed (325 AD), it is the words,”We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ, the only Son of God, eternally begotten of the Father, God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God, begotten, not made, one in being with the Father”, think of and thank St Athanasius, and those who held to the orthodox belief of the Trinity despite profound opposition and difficulty. We have Arius to thank that we are so emphatic, repeating over and over this truth when we pray the Creed, seventeen centuries later. Arius had trouble with the Trinity. Granted, that’s a tough one for any Christian, even the most erudite theologians, to wrap their minds around, let alone explain. Hence the ascription as mystery. But, mystery as it may be, most Christians do not slip into heresy and lead others to follow because they don’t like it, most.
“You will not see anyone who is really striving after his advancement who is not given to spiritual reading. And as to him who neglects it, the fact will soon be observed by his progress.”
“Jesus, Whom I know as my Redeemer, cannot be less than God.”